Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610)

David with the Head of Goliath, (c1609–1610)

David with the Head of Goliath, (c1609–1610)

David with the Head of Goliath

At first glance this painting didn’t have much meaning to me, it looked like any other painting of the time. Another classic Baroque  painting style with beautiful chiaroscuro, tenenbrism techniques and religious theme. However, once I read the head of Goliath was actually a self-portrait of the artist himself and the painting was made to be given as a gift in hopes for a pardon in Rome. This painting instantly became more interesting and made me ask the question, “Why would an artist depict himself in such a manner and why would he need a pardon?”.

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio

To answer the question we first have to know where he came from. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610) grew up in the country with his mother and father. Sadly his father died when he was 5 or 6 yrs old and his mother passed when he was either 13 or 19 (conflicting data). The same year his mother passed Caravaggio began to study under the painter Simone Peterzano.  At the age of 21 he left Caravaggio for Rome. He arrived homeless and needy and the only way for him to survive was through his paintings. Rome was the beginning and the end for Caravaggio.

After reading and watching an hour-long movie about him. Caravaggio’s biography is very complicated and still to this day controversial. Most of what is known about him is through historical court records from when he was in trouble by the law. However, the best way for me to sum up his life’s story is that Caravaggio was a successfully brilliant painter whose life was filled with drunken brawls, chronic despair, mental illness, murder, exile and his life ended with a lonely and sad death. However, his paintings were a legendary success thanks in part to the Council of Trent

The Council of Trent

The Protestant Reformation believed that Churches should not be adorned in paintings or images to worship. However, the Council of Trent which included the Catholic Church and Jesuit argued that paintings and sculptures depicting religious stories from the bible were crucial. They were important in preaching and spreading the word of the Bible to the poorer, less educated, illiterate population. This argument was Caravaggio’s salvation for many of his paintings were commissioned by the Church in Rome. In turn the church and his high power friends protected him when he got into brawls and a drunken stupor.

My Analysis

David with the Head of Goliath, really impacted me. Not so much the story about David and Goliath, but the hidden dual meaning within is what really touches me. To me the true meaning of this painting is not only about conquering evil with God’s strength, but also about forgiveness. Despite having a successful painting career Caravaggio’s life was filled with drunken binges and brawls, which landed him in and out of jail and one of those nights ended with him killing a man, an ultimate sin. To forgive someone is difficult, to forgive oneself is that much harder.

This painting seems to tell a story spanning generations from his youth, to his life of torment, to his ultimate salvation death. David is suspected to be a self-portrait of a young Caravaggio which symbolizes his innocence. David carries the head of  a older image of Caravaggio which to me symbolizes disgrace and shame.  The boy looking at his future self disgusted, with pity on his face for the life Caravaggio lived. Goliath’s head or Caravaggio’s older self is one of the last self-portraits he painted before he died. Goliath’s eyes look down as if his shame and guilt keep him from being able to look up. His sins have caught up to him and the blood spilling underneath could mean the daily loss of life, loss of self. His mouth slightly open as if trying to say something perhaps, “I’m sorry”, “Forgive me” or “Thank you”, to his younger self. David also looks as though he is relieved and happy to have stopped the agony Goliath had been  enduring for so long.  To me this painting screams pain, despair and begs for forgiveness not only from the audience but for himself.

Conclusion

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio was a brilliant artist with a sad story.  I would highly recommend reading more of him or watch this short movie about his life http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUeGRGLGXFY.  I guarantee his story will be captivating.

Sources:

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/C/caravaggio.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caravaggio

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Reformation_and_art

Categories: Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610)

  1. What a great post. I love how you broke down the imagery depicted in this painting. I can see the looks of shame, disgust and regret on the face of “Goliath” as show by Caravaggio. His life was a complete mess, alcoholism, violence, incarceration and in the end his death. It’s almost like the life of many celebrities seen in today’s day and age. I really think it’s interesting how Caravaggio saw himself in this piece. His relation to his own life and the slaying of David almost like he was slaying his own personal demons and in the end he was able to conquer them in some ways before it was really too late. Thanks for sharing.

  2. You did a great job analyzing this piece! I liked how you broke it down into different parts. This piece is a bit complicated at first glance and it really helped to clarify some things. Caravaggio’s story is sad and this painting really shows a sense of sorrow and plead for forgiveness. Very interesting piece.

  3. The background you gave on the the life and the happenings when Caravaggio was living gave me more insite into his work. Your analyze of this particular painting was great. The only discrepancy I can find is that the model for David is supposedly a young man who was Caravaggio’s assistant. Even with this being the case I still think the underlying theory of an older man seeking forgiveness and a younger man setting him free from his suffering is correct. The engraving on the sword seems to back this up also. The engraving is H-AS OS which has been interpreted as Humilitas occidit superbiam (humility kills pride).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: